Feminism And Humanism Sitting In A Tree

Somehow Feminism is a word that continues to evoke far more controversy and polarisation than one would expect. I mean, how long has it been around already? By conservative standards it can be traced back to old pictures of early woman suffrage rallies, big hats and sashes aplenty, from the infancy of the last century. Others would attach all of the struggles for women's rights throughout history to this more recent label. Either way, I think the point is clear. Feminism is not new. In fact it is a fixture in social discourse and is covered, as briefly and poorly as most topics, in the curriculum of most public schools. So why all the ongoing fuss?
First, allow me to acknowledge that there are those who hold extreme views on the matter. Most notably the "women need to know their place" on the anti-female end and "men are rapists" on the anti-male end. I'm sure many of you have shared my uneasiness as such views make their unexpected appearance in an otherwise interesting civil discussion about the sexes. Particularly irritating is when it surfaces out the mouth of someone who's been agreeing with your point of view. So fun, switching over to legal talk clarifying one's own opposition to sexism or even crazy hate talk. A bit less productive. And BTW, if you don't know what I'm talking about you need to live a less sheltered life or you, more likely, hold the lunatic views I'm addressing. For help in ridding yourself of said acidity immediately remove yourself from your religion and/or grow up and get over your painful past.

How I See Feminism

Allow me to roll about in the valley of common sense for a time, nestled between the mountain ranges of dumbass and emotional problems. Nestled here with the vast majority of you fine members of civilisation focused on real problems and trying to be better people. Despite our imperfections we do not feel the need to flex our manly muscles and push women around to feel confident about our penises. Neither do we compulsively starve or shake select naked portions of our bodies at night clubs to feel we have enough value to merit being loved.
We do what we do because we want to. Men and women but, more importantly, as individuals each in a different way. What kind of a pathetic existence it would be to ignore the beauty of your uniqueness to run after the approval of other people who exert pressure to conform to an ideal male or female social identity. Shouting at men to drive larger pickups and watch more football or bellowing like an idiot for women to try out for the fire department and not shave their armpits. Give it a rest. Let people be who they are and deal with your own damn issues.
The only thing that matters is that we respect each other and appreciate our differences, including sex. There is no shame or danger in the variations in men and women. Embrace it. Own it. Love it.

Acknowledging The Past

Many conversations about the rights of women will hinge in no small part upon the attitudes concerning the history of oppression of women and its bearing on society today. To deny that there remains a very real and prolific influence of inequality both in the material and psychological sense would be more than irresponsible. It would be insidious. Life is often in the struggle and I will not pretend to have the answers for the many often complex issues that lie in the interplay between the sexes. Gender identity and individual versus social identity are undoubtedly at the heart of the confusion but I feel we are slowly making progress. So much depends on every person taking responsibility for their thoughts, words and actions. Responsibility for maturing and putting away these outdated and ridiculous models of life portrayed on old television sitcoms.
On many occasions, despite having a penis, I have found myself taking up the flag of feminism in discussions both heated and calm. It is difficult to express how it feels to be prying open a woman's mind to the realisation that the limitations on her life have been self imposed by a systematic indoctrination stemming from her childhood and conditioning resulting from her familiar environment. Who the hell left this to me? Are you all insane? I suppose we all play our role in humanity's slow surfacing but it is a real Matrixy moment. I don't even want to get into the debates over how genetics play into it all but I will say that there are many areas of scientific research both social and biological and I encourage readers to look into them. It is amazing what can be observed.

Dealing With Assholes And Their Shit

This long journey of understanding what we call male and what we call female began for me when I was a child. I remember a determination in my heart when I would see my mother crying after an inability of my parents to communicate with each other effectively. My parents have always loved each other but like the rest of us have had to work to overcome barriers in their relationships. This can be tedious and seem hopeless at times. Some of us are laden with scars from past pain or trauma but it is critical we not give in to the darkness of hate or despair. The following is my plain portrait of lost and angry souls you should be wary of. They do not seek understanding or equality but vengeance and to spread a shared increase in suffering. Misery loves company.

Men Who Want Control-  These pathetic creatures will seek to dominate women by means religious, economic, social, physical, psychological, etc. Be ready to stand your ground or even flee if necessary in the moment. Support for the vulnerable women by men and women in her community and family is a moral compulsory action as isolation can cripple those most in need of liberation. We must all be prepared to question our true situation and be willing to make the changes needed. Am I mistreating, am I being mistreated, is someone I know being mistreated? What am I going to do about it? Because life should be free and the bonds of abusive control are destructive, immoral, and must be actively fought.

Women Who Attack- For a long time I thought that the idea of women who went through life antagonising and attacking men was a silly imagined concoction. I had not really noticed such behaviour outside of disputes where it would be expected on either side but there have certainly been a few shining examples as the years have gone by. I watched a crack-head (literal drug addict) torture a friend while he simply tried to maintain a presence in his daughter's life. Her antics were psychotic and there is a need to witness such displays to really believe. I have seen women pressure their male partner into ending friendships, quiting careers or dreams, even demanding he turn his back on family. Setting aside unusual circumstances, all of these damning behaviours stem from a place of pain in the woman's psychology. They are actions we call disorders and are every bit as unacceptable as the dysfunctional ways of their male counterparts. Odds are that this type of injustice, rather than abuse of authority or physical abuse more typically commited by men, will probably manifest as a cruel friend, demeaning spouse, or manipulative partner. They may be a participant in a feminist organisation disguising her true motivations for her involvement. This type of hatred in an equality and education movement can do serious harm and truly hurts women as surely as men.

Everyone should be vigilant in questioning their own motives, be honest with oneself, and check that their activities are productive and positively effecting the community. We can all be wrong. Catch it. Fix it.

A Few Thoughts


Equity vs Gender Feminism (One is science friendly, the other not)

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolutionary-entertainment/201205/giving-feminism-bad-name


An Excellent Example Of A Woman Supremacist (or possible drunk party girl on a free ride)

-Long read but worth it
-A feminist who does little to better women, much to demonize men, and tons to promote herself
-A skeptic spokesperson who attacks science and adheres to none of the principles of skepticism
-Does all of this time and again at science heavy skeptic conventions, much like the one in this video
http://skepticink.com/incredulous/2012/12/01/science-denialism-at-a-skeptic-conference/

Schools of Feminist Thought (Cindy Moore)

http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/modern/Schools-of-Feminist-Thought.html

Wiki resources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism

The Cult Of Personality: Why Atheism Should Not Embrace Celebrity

Over the last year I have made it my business to become familiar with the various social realms in the atheist movement. During the same period our first serious rift has occurred and the entire atmosphere has been filled with unbelievable hostility and acrimony, leaving many declaring their neutrality or avoiding the topic altogether. I have kept my opinion relatively quiet as I attempted to gain more information about the source of this conflict and to contemplate what to think of the entire affair. The following is my assessment and explains how hoisting personalities aloft has threatened much needed gains via atheist solidarity, instead drawing lines of loyalty and pride.


The Constituent Parts Of The Atheist Community

The greater community has four major areas of focus, all of which overlap, working together. These efforts are usually relatively easy and respectful but the specialisation of each leaning is still significant and, understanding them, go a long way in explaining the conflicts of late.

Skeptics- Those who identify primarily as skeptics are focused on challenging all claims forwarded by any group or individual based on the offered weight of evidence and method of reasoning behind it. "Skepticism or scepticism is generally any questioning attitude towards knowledge, facts, or opinions/beliefs stated as facts, or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere." -wikipedia . I belong to a local skeptics group myself and have a high regard for the value of their work. I'm a mere amateur but learning and using these critical reasoning tools improves the quality of my life and those around me. I have found that those who most identify as skeptics often run the risk of over dependence on specific types of knowledge while being naive about others. Specifically, they tend to be masters of science and technology but deficit in psychology, making them champions in the charge against religious irrationality but alarmingly suseptible to players within the ranks.

Freethinkers- Independent thinkers. Free will, free thought, these atheists do not let anyone tell them what to think or feel. It is particularly difficult to organise freethinkers as many have escaped years of the controlling influence of organised religion. "Freethought is a philosophical viewpoint that holds opinions should be formed on the basis of logic, reason and empiricism and not authority, tradition, or other dogmas. The experience of freethought is known as "freethinking," and practitioners of freethought are known as "freethinkers." " -wikipedia . I find that those who most strongly identify as freethinkers are often prone to offer support from behind the scenes, preferring not to be drawn into public debates or expectations of public leadership probably because they no longer feel obligated to answer to anyone. They do step up when necessary and their support to atheism is significant but they can be difficult to gauge on issues of intense disagreement.

Secularists- The identity of the secularist is most heavily that of separation of church and state. The idea that all things public and shared, especially the government in every form, should not be partial to any ideology or group in society. "Secularism is the principle of separation of government institutions, and the persons mandated to represent the State, from religious institutions and religious dignitaries. In one sense, secularism may assert the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, and the right to freedom from governmental imposition of religion upon the people within a state that is neutral on matters of belief. In another sense, it refers to the view that human activities and decisions, especially political ones, should be unbiased by religious influence." -wikipedia. The very freedoms atheists enjoy to descent in our society depends on the important voice raised by secularists who are often drawn from the ranks of historians and legal experts. Unfortunately, the risk running into the "everyone for themselves" attitude seems unusually rampant with this crowd. For many the cause of working together for this separation of influence and power is for the freedom to look out for their own interests without unwarranted limitations or interference.

Humanists- Finally, we have our big hearted humanists. Their major identifying focus is on the human condition. Alleviating suffering, promoting equality, and creating opportunity for improved quality of life. This concern is not based on any notions of gods or spirits but simply the connections we all share as human beings. "Humanism is the body of philosophies and ethical perspectives that emphasise the value of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally place more importance on rational thought than on strict faith. During the Renaissance period in Western Europe humanist movements attempted to demonstrate the benefit of gaining learning from classical, pre-Christian sources, which had previously been frowned upon by the Roman Catholic Church." -wikipedia. The most likely bunch of atheists to be organising and standing on the front line of rallies and protests for a wide variety of human rights will be the humanists. The only down side is the potential of emotion to overwhelm rational discourse at times, that very passion that motivates the incredible deeds of good.

The Big Fall Down

Essentially this entire dispute of self-righteous contention began with a minor event and swelled irrationally from there. Rebecca Watson recounted being approached late one night while alone with a man in an elevator and she found it intimidating and inappropriate. Some questioned why she was making such a big deal about it while others responded by flocking to her side. What followed was several months of useless vitriol spearheaded by a small number of rather well recognised personalities within the atheist community. Waxing loyalty and stoking their egos, this small number of self anointed moral leaders has caused more than mere embarrassment as their efforts to tame and control the conversation and even the vision of the wild community. I have remembered through this turmoil the lesson of expertise being specialised in contrast to our expectation of our figureheads to be masters of all they survey. In so much, I have to say I have lost a great deal of respect for many people who have done so much for atheism in the past. Particularly those who still refuse to admit to any mistakes or wrong doing.
The lesson should not be hate. We need not throw out so many good minds and voices if only we come to grips with the lesson of the cult of personality. It isn't new, nor the destruction flowing from it's mouth. It was the shift in Roman society that paved the way for the Caesars, that stripped countless bodies of proper governance throughout history in favour of a few popular power seekers. Destructive and ultimately futile, the cult of personality will carve out and shatter any unified body in order to feed the hungry vanity of a few. As atheists we are in the unique position of not requiring any such personality worship. Our leadership should ever and only be chosen and maintained by merit of expertise and value of their contribution to any particular action or cause. Acting out? Toss them out. Let them earn their favour back though deeds and words the community can respect.
Fuck Atheism Plus, and the whores it rode in on.

A Few Personalities In Particular

The following are people who have misused the trust afforded them in their public platforms in order to demand attention and adherence to themselves. I advise you to either avoid their influence altogether of, if curious, to be wary of placing any stock in their capability to place the well being of the atheist community ahead of their own desires.

Rebecca Watson- Rebecca is supposed to be a skeptic but has demonstrated an alarming pattern of both accusing and organising to attack opponents without evidence. These are not attacks to be ignored as they include false allegations, slander, pressure brought to exclude speakers from speaking at conventions or at times even attending, and getting opponents fired from their jobs. These egregious acts are wholly unforgivable from a self professed leader in the skeptical movement. Why so many have chosen to loyally support a relatively unaccomplished 32 year old blogger who shows open contempt for men at every single speaking engagement is rather beyond me. She has taken the cause of female equality as her personal armour against all criticism and has spread the unfounded impression of wide spread sexism in the atheist community out into the general public media. In psychological terms, I believe she may be a sociopath.

Matt Dillahunty- Matt was once a lifetime evangelical in training to be a preacher when he came to his realisation that believing without evidence was irrational and dishonest. Since that time he has spent years challenging believers to "give me the evidence" on a call in show The Atheist Experience out of Texas. It is very popular and Matt has done a great deal in terms of educating the public about atheism and equipping atheists to argue their point of view in public or defend it in discussion. Imagine my anguish then as I watched Matt refuse to admit that his friends and their supporters were out of control and violating the very principals he had demanded of religious callers for so long. Attacks and insinuations without the least bit of evidence, anger and vitriol, until Matt exposed the hypocrisy with a public act of trickery. Still unable to choose reason over loyalty, sadly Matt still backs these cultists and in doing so has betrayed his own credo. He even insisted that no evidence was needed for Rebecca's accusation because "this type of thing happens". Goodbye Matt, we will miss you in the skeptic's community.

PZ Myers- Myers is a well respected biologist who also has done a great deal in debunking the Intelligent Design agenda. As with the other offenders Myers has contributed much to the atheist movement in the past but with the outbreak of Atheism Plus began to expose a much less professional, rational side to his personality. I'll just say this man's attitude towards those he disagrees with is less than cordial. He is a nasty tempered brat. Read here Most of these control freak personalities have blogs on Myers' blog site Freethought Blogs, a site created to prevent censorship and promote the expression of independent ideas. Imagine the gall it must have taken Myers to then boot off Thunderf00t, one of the site's bloggers, for expressing his thoughts freely. Disagreeing on their perspectives on feminism immediately launched censorship retaliation. And the name is still Freethought Blogs. The irony that this expulsion was an attempt to promote "diversity" within the larger atheist community is apparently lost on this self important hot head.

Richard Carrier- Carrier is an accomplished history scholar with a PhD. Once champion to many in the atheist movement, Carrier has now become the mad dog, Tom Cruise of the Atheism Plus campaign. This fool exposed to everyone the true attitudes of the god heads with a hasty and overly honest post on his blog. There is no excuse for his aspersions and having revealed his views of fellow freethinkers, he should be ignored entirely in favour of those willing to display respect or at least civility. Here are two quotes. Nuff said:

“Don’t assume that because someone else did that, that it’s covered and you can give it a miss. No, we need to show numbers. So speak out wherever you see these two sides at loggerheads, and voice your affiliation, so it’s clear how many of us there are, against them. And this very much is an us vs. them situation. The compassionate vs. the vile. You can’t sit on the fence on this one. In a free society, apathy is an endorsement of villainy.”

and

“Those who don’t, those who aren’t shamed by being exposed as liars or hypocrites, those who persist in being dishonest or inconsistent even when their dishonesty or inconsistency has been soundly demonstrated, is not one of us, and is to be marginalised and kicked out, as not part of our movement, and not anyone we any longer wish to deal with.”
 

 Wow, what a rational skeptic. So freethinking. Read more here from Thunderf00t.


Final Word

Do not trust those who tear down the accomplishments of others, especially if they have none of their own to offer. Be wary of those who claim to have such moral causes that they deserve automatic rights, respect, and submission of any kind. These things are no different than the religious traps of our past and we should all have learnt that respect is earned.

A vibrant counter can be heard here and here from Reap Sow Radio.

This is Mykeru and you should hear what he knows about this whole bunch of intolerants:

Everyone just needs to learn to mind their own damn business up in here.